Jason Kottke proposes "sweethearting," and
I'm not sure what I think about it.
The idea is that when I press a couple of buttons on my phone (say, 1#), a
tiny content-less message is sent to the person corresponding to that key
combination. On their end, they see something like "Jason pinged you at
7:34pm" with the option to ping right back. You'd have to set up what pings
mean beforehand, stuff like "I'm leaving work now" or "remember to pick up
milk at the store".
Pings would be perfect for situations when texting or a phone call is too
time consuming, distracting, or takes you out of the flow of your present
experience.
On the one hand, this seems like technology in search of a problem. On the
other, I've overheard plenty of mobile phone calls that are not much more
than "I'm on Metro at East Falls Church," meaning, "and if you leave from
home now we'll meet at Vienna at the same time." I can see cases where
pinging would minimize the distraction and aggravation. Heck, some people
use caller ID to serve the same purpose already.
...you could ping someone [just] to let them know you're thinking about
them.
And yet, the human touch seems to be missing. There is something in me that
says that reading a text message display isn't the same thing as hearing
someone's voice, albeit digitized, modulated, and amplified into a tiny
tinny speaker.
But I can't reconcile this feeling with the fact that I prefer sending and
receiving e-mail to phone calls, in most cases. An e-mail message hits the
sweet spot of "I have some information for you, or I have a question, but
you don't need to respond right away." Ringing phones and booping IM
windows are too intrusive, too much "talk to me right now!"
So... ping your sweetie, but keep it personal, too. Send a birthday card.
Don't forget to send her flowers or dust his tchotchkes.
posted:
4:10:51 PM
|